This piece would be more credible if it reckoned with some of the evidence widely reported elsewhere about this case, like the video showing the person with a megaphone in front of a giant "by any means necessary" banner, or the fact that he was a mediator for a group that broke rules by taking over a building. That is hard to square with the portrayal here, which is similar to what you might find in any left-wing publication and not what I expect from the Sundial.
There is an abundance of evidence of Mohsen’s commitment to non-violence from his own speeches, writing and presentations as well as the personal relationships he’s made over the last ten years, including my friendship with him (I am Jewish and have strong ties to israel). Also the two pieces of evidence that your refer, what do you think they say about him? To me the first one says that he existed in a space where people held a variety of viewpoints, perhaps one being that “any means necessary are justified”, but if you actually listen to Mohsen or get to know him it is very clear that this is not his view.
You’d be more credible if you did not misapprehend “genocide” and falsely accuse Israel of that which the Arabs have attempted against Israel for decades.
“Palestinianism” is the lie that denies Jewish indigeneity in Israel. “Palestinianism” is the lie that denies and appropriates Jewish history and culture. “Palestinianism” is the lie created to destroy Israel. Therefore “Never Again” is the emptiest of all rhetoric unless we insist that the world abandon the lie that is “palestinianism.”
This piece would be more credible if it reckoned with some of the evidence widely reported elsewhere about this case, like the video showing the person with a megaphone in front of a giant "by any means necessary" banner, or the fact that he was a mediator for a group that broke rules by taking over a building. That is hard to square with the portrayal here, which is similar to what you might find in any left-wing publication and not what I expect from the Sundial.
There is an abundance of evidence of Mohsen’s commitment to non-violence from his own speeches, writing and presentations as well as the personal relationships he’s made over the last ten years, including my friendship with him (I am Jewish and have strong ties to israel). Also the two pieces of evidence that your refer, what do you think they say about him? To me the first one says that he existed in a space where people held a variety of viewpoints, perhaps one being that “any means necessary are justified”, but if you actually listen to Mohsen or get to know him it is very clear that this is not his view.
There is nothing moderate or non-violent in denying Jewish self-determination on Jewish land.
You’d be more credible if you just admitted you’re cool with genocide and cold towards the 1st Amendment.
You’d be more credible if you did not misapprehend “genocide” and falsely accuse Israel of that which the Arabs have attempted against Israel for decades.
You’re a holocaust denier.
Sweetie,
We can add “holocaust” to the list of words you don’t understand. Would you care to misapprehend “apartheid” and complete the trifecta of idiocy?
Zios appropriate words like they appropriate other people’s culture and other people’s land.
You’re not Semites.
You’re not Jews.
You’re not people.
You’re parasites.
It’s hard to measure which is greater, your bigotry or your idiocy? Maybe it’s a false dichotomy.
A sweet Hamas supporter
And on the photo, he wears a keffieh… that says it all.
“Palestinianism” is the lie that denies Jewish indigeneity in Israel. “Palestinianism” is the lie that denies and appropriates Jewish history and culture. “Palestinianism” is the lie created to destroy Israel. Therefore “Never Again” is the emptiest of all rhetoric unless we insist that the world abandon the lie that is “palestinianism.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/bariweiss/p/who-is-the-real-mohsen-mahdawi?r=ehvfm&utm_medium=ios
Gray scale better than black and white